Injunction denied! Courts should not be at the centre of forestry politics

Sep 29, 2021 | Blog, Environment | 4 comments

This past summer we have seen the logging dispute at Fairy Creek deteriorate into violent interactions between protesters and the RCMP enforcing a court ordered injunction. That injunction expired this week.

I have maintained all summer that the BC NDP government is solely responsible for this situation and that it is totally unacceptable for them to sit in the background forcing local First Nations, the RCMP and the courts onto the front lines and into the middle of a political dispute between the provincial government and protesters. I have consistently called on Premier John Horgan and Forest Minister Katrine Conroy to step out of the darkness and be publicly accountable for their forestry policy.

Yesterday, Justice Douglas Thompson said he wants the courts off the front line. In a 32-page decision he ruled against granting a 12-month extension of the injunction to Teal Jones for logging around the Fairy Creek watershed.

Justice Thompson weighed the “strong public interest in keeping the Court away from the front line of the dispute” (para. 66), which has become an increasing issue throughout the summer months as “the Court’s reputation has been depreciated by the manner in which the order has been enforced” (para. 69.)

Justice Thompson was sharply critical of the RCMP tactics of limiting access to public roads, limiting media access, the removal of RCMP identification, and the wearing of the “thin blue line” patches.

Reading these court decisions often requires the reader to follow the Justice through a series of other decisions. That is the case here. In para. 42, Justice Thompson agrees with a previous ruling stating that if there are other courses of action that can be taken, they should be. Meaning, injunctions should be used as a last resort and that “the risks attendant upon the converting of a dispute between the citizen and the logging company or the citizen and the government into a dispute between the citizen and the court are serious indeed.”

In simple terms, Justice Thompson determined that the court should not be on the front line of the dispute and as a result he turned it over to the Attorney General and the RCMP. In para. 68 he writes, “another available choice is to get the Court out from the middle of this dispute, and let the government and police do what they will with the tools at their disposal — patrolling the roads and other lawful preventive policing measures, mobilization of the criminal law, and use of provincial laws such as the Forest and Range Practices Act. And, if the available means of ensuring that rights lawfully bestowed by the Legislature can be exercised are not adequate, there are legislative options.”

All summer I have been raising my deep concerns about the actions (or lack thereof) of Premier Horgan and his BC NDP government. They decided to grant a license to Teal Jones for logging in the Fairy Creek area and then when the logging blockades heated up, they retreated into silence.

Premier Horgan’s lack of accountability has created a dangerous situation that puts local First Nations, the RCMP and the court in direct conflict with the protesters. His reluctance to show leadership on this critical issue is completely unacceptable. Our Premier has retreated into the big office he coveted and drawn the curtains when he should step up and negotiate a different outcome.

Premier Horgan, your forestry policy has lost social license and your lack of action has resulted in over 1000 arrests throughout this bitter and violent dispute. Premier Horgan you must carry the burden for the decisions you have made – not the local First Nations, not the RCMP, and not the courts.

Over to you Mr. Premier, the blockades continue and time is of the essence.


  1. Simon P. A. Clarke

    Well said. All the protesters are trying to do is to get the BCNDP to live up to their word and ‘mandate’. It is inconceivable to me that they continue to hide after making it very clear what their stated intentions were. There should be some recourse against politicians who say things just to get elected and then do nothing/the complete opposite. No wonder Horgan and Trudean get along so well. They’re both cut from the same (liar) cloth.

  2. Bev Bacon

    Thank you Adam for continuing to speak up on the critical issue of old-growth logging and the Premier’s lack of action. John Horgan clearly can’t see the forest for the fibre. He knows a lot about resource extraction

    There is another part to this story that amazes me. The NDP has some good MLAs. with relevant credentials, knowledge and experience (environment, biodiversity, climate, law, indigenous relations, civil rights, human rights). Why are they silent?
    What does this say about their professional ethics and judgement?

    Why are people not calling for a leadership review?

  3. Mary Leslie

    I am heading with a group of elders to Fairy Creek on Tuesday, by bus, and would also like to write a letter to NDP MLA’s that are opposed to the premier’s stance on old growth, if the names of who they are in available. Raincoast Flying Squad are asking us to write our MLA, but you do not need a letter on this topic. I have already written to Horgan twice and to Murray Rankin. I know where Katrine Conroy sits on this file.
    any tips would be helpful.
    Also, Adam, Have you given a formal speech or written up your views on the forestry agreement that the NDP are using, that the liberals used during their time in government also. You have been articulate at times in spoken form, but I would like to forward anything written you have done on the downsides of that agreement and how it compromises first nations on whose land these forestry contracts are drawn up.

  4. L.Y. Pawlivsky-Love

    All that needed to happen was the feds and provincial governments to cough up enough $$$ (like they did to buy a pipeline many Canadians didn’t want) and buy out the contract. Pay out Teal-Jones and ‘buy’ the trees to protect them! Giving a solution instead of allowing bullying and creating tensions ignoring the problem creates more divisiveness.

    I am surprised the court didn’t order a settlement offer but that may have been outside their realm. A judicial dispute resolution could have demanded that a monetary settlement be made. The reality is First Nations land decisions have to be respected but in this case it’s all about money. I’m just surprised that the federal government didn’t just resolve this whole thing buying the trees to stay in the ground.

    My two cents worth!

Share This

Share this post with your friends!